Naviga

  • Home
  • Services
    • Supply Chain Resiliency Assessment
  • About
    • FAQ
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Services
    • Supply Chain Resiliency Assessment
  • About
    • FAQ
  • Resources
  • Contact

ARTICLES, CASE STUDIES & NEWS

Efficient Product Development is Driven by a System Approach That Continually Considers Value

12/17/2019

 
Picture
Peter Heuss, P. Eng.
Co-Founder, Berlin KraftWorks Inc.
Nearly all product development is a multi-disciplinary effort, usually with tight constraints on time, cost and function. But most engineering groups tend to design in isolation, where even the different engineering disciplines don’t interact, let alone considering supply chain, manufacturing, service, test etc… The risk is a design that doesn’t meet the business goals and needs to be reworked or adversely affects the company’s performance. I’ve learned this hard way in the past, having to re-design mechanical systems, for example, when they wouldn’t work with what the electrical engineers designed.
 
There are two principles that will help develop better products, quicker – value analysis (a part of lean and value stream theory) and systems design.
 
Every process is made up of a series of steps or tasks. These tasks may not be linear, there may be a complex set of interactions required, but they always share the same basic structure. Every task includes a set of inputs, has a set of required outputs, has stakeholders who use those outputs, and is done under a set of constraints.
 
The outputs should be based entirely on the value they deliver. The end goal is always to produce a product that meets the company’s goals as outlined in their business case. If the output of any task doesn’t contribute to those business goals, it’s waste. If the output has to be reworked because it doesn’t work with some other part of the design, it’s also waste.
 
The inputs are where many design processes slip. I think everyone will agree that every part in a design is somehow affected by the other parts. It could be as simple as a bracket holding a PCB or as complicated as a motion control system controlling the movement of mechanical components driven by remote user input. The key to effective design is to consider those interactions from the start of design.
 
System thinking is a way of looking at the inter-relationships of parts once they have been combined into a system. A portion of a design may seem appropriate on its own, but when taken in context with the entire system may fail. For example:
  • A new cutting-edge processor may solve a technical issue, but is useless if it’s still in development and can’t be purchased in volume.
  • A lightweight plastic housing may be inexpensive and look good, but may not be stiff enough to control a moving part.
  • A metal enclosure may have the strength and aesthetics required at a good cost, but blocks the Bluetooth communication.
 
System Design is the application of systems theory to product development, taking a multi-disciplinary approach to design and implementation. It’s not a new concept, but it’s one that will save a lot of design time and produce a better design.
 
The key to planning and executing the design is to first to consider the value each task creates. The three primary aspects of value are:
  1. The task contributes directly to the form and/or function of the end product as outlined in the business case.
  2. The task affects the processes that deliver the part - such as tooling, testing, and creation of manufacturing procedures.
  3. The task contributes to lowering risk in cost, performance, schedule, or safety.
 
If we understand what value each task is to deliver, we can better understand what needs to be designed, and more importantly what is not required. And that helps determine what inputs we need to carry out that design.
 
Those inputs will typically be from multiple sources including the design specification, outputs from preceding tasks, input from concurrent tasks, and some additional design knowledge and information. If we continually look at how each task is effected by previous tasks and how it is effected by and affects concurrent tasks, we can complete each task in a way the develops the most value for the overall system.
 
By considering the entire system when planning each design task, and the value that task is generating, we can be more effective, producing better designs with less waste.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Archive
    Case Study
    Design
    Engineering
    Featured Manufacturer
    Manufacturing
    Project Management
    Strategy
    Supply Chain

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019

    RSS Feed

Subscribe to our emails to learn more about local manufacturing and stay up to date with news from the Naviga team.

HOME | SERVICES | ABOUT | RESOURCES | CONTACT​​
​PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS OF USE
© 2022 Naviga Supply Chain Inc. All rights reserved.